Skip to main content

Altona Meadows vs Drummond North

Property investment comparison - Altona Meadows, VIC 3028 vs Drummond North, VIC 3446

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Altona Meadows wins 3, Drummond North wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAltona MeadowsDrummond North
Median house price$775K$775K
Median unit price$560K$1.9M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.65%3.18%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%-
1-year house growth+5.4%-
3-year house growth+11.6%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.6%
Population18,479203

Altona Meadows vs Drummond North: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $775K in Altona Meadows and $775K in Drummond North.

For units, Altona Meadows sits at a median of $560K against $1.9M in Drummond North, which makes Altona Meadows the more affordable unit market and Drummond North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Altona Meadows leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 3.18% in Drummond North, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Altona Meadows and 1.6% in Drummond North, so landlords in Altona Meadows face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Altona Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,479 against 203, roughly 91 times the size of Drummond North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Altona Meadows for rental income, Altona Meadows for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison