Skip to main content

Altona North vs Tolmie

Property investment comparison - Altona North, VIC 3025 vs Tolmie, VIC 3723

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Altona North wins 3, Tolmie wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAltona NorthTolmie
Median house price$960K$965K
Median unit price$730K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%3.65%
Gross rental yield (units)4.45%9.45%
1-year house growth+3.2%-
3-year house growth+8.2%-
Vacancy rate1.0%3.7%
Population12,962547

Altona North vs Tolmie: what the numbers say

The median house price is $960K in Altona North and $965K in Tolmie, so Altona North is the cheaper entry point, with Tolmie houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Altona North sits at a median of $730K against $445K in Tolmie, which makes Tolmie the more affordable unit market and Altona North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Altona North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.65% in Tolmie, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Altona North and 3.7% in Tolmie, so landlords in Altona North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Altona North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,962 against 547, roughly 24 times the size of Tolmie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Altona North for rental income, Altona North for a lower purchase price, Altona North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison