Skip to main content

Ambarvale vs Ballina

Property investment comparison - Ambarvale, NSW 2560 vs Ballina, NSW 2478

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ambarvale wins 3, Ballina wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAmbarvaleBallina
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price$655K$735K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.22%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%4.36%
1-year house growth+9.2%+5.8%
3-year house growth+21.8%+19.0%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.3%
Population7,2549,735

Ambarvale vs Ballina: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Ambarvale and $980K in Ballina.

For units, Ambarvale sits at a median of $655K against $735K in Ballina, which makes Ambarvale the more affordable unit market and Ballina the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Ambarvale and +5.8% in Ballina, so recent momentum favours Ambarvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Ambarvale houses are +21.8% and Ballina houses +19.0%, so Ambarvale has compounded faster than Ballina over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Ballina and 1.0% in Ambarvale, so landlords in Ballina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ballina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,735 against 7,254, larger than Ambarvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ambarvale for recent price momentum, Ballina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison