Amherst vs Canadian
Property investment comparison - Amherst, VIC 3371 vs Canadian, VIC 3350
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Amherst wins 2, Canadian wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Amherst | Canadian |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $600K | $600K |
| Median unit price | $210K | $445K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.77% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.67% | 4.60% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +14.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 0.4% |
| Population | 63 | 4,098 |
Amherst vs Canadian: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $600K in Amherst and $600K in Canadian.
For units, Amherst sits at a median of $210K against $445K in Canadian, which makes Amherst the more affordable unit market and Canadian the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Canadian and 2.8% in Amherst, so landlords in Canadian face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Canadian is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,098 against 63, roughly 65 times the size of Amherst; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Canadian for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison