Skip to main content

Amity vs Flying Fox

Property investment comparison - Amity, QLD 4183 vs Flying Fox, QLD 4275

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Amity wins 4, Flying Fox wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAmityFlying Fox
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$600K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)8.21%4.01%
Gross rental yield (units)3.75%1.76%
1-year house growth+16.4%-
3-year house growth+60.0%-
Vacancy rate0.8%2.5%
Population45361

Amity vs Flying Fox: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Amity and $1.4M in Flying Fox, so Flying Fox is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Amity sits at a median of $600K against $840K in Flying Fox, which makes Amity the more affordable unit market and Flying Fox the pricier one.

On cash flow, Amity leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.21%, compared with 4.01% in Flying Fox, a gap of 4.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Amity and 2.5% in Flying Fox, so landlords in Amity face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Amity is the bigger suburb, with a population of 453 against 61, roughly 7 times the size of Flying Fox; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Amity for rental income, Flying Fox for a lower purchase price, Amity for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison