Ancona vs Portarlington
Property investment comparison - Ancona, VIC 3715 vs Portarlington, VIC 3223
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ancona wins 1, Portarlington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ancona | Portarlington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825K | $825K |
| Median unit price | $850K | $630K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.27% | 3.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 2.1% |
| Population | 99 | 4,436 |
Ancona vs Portarlington: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $825K in Ancona and $825K in Portarlington.
For units, Ancona sits at a median of $850K against $630K in Portarlington, which makes Portarlington the more affordable unit market and Ancona the pricier one.
On cash flow, Ancona leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.27%, compared with 3.50% in Portarlington, a gap of 0.77 percentage points.
Portarlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,436 against 99, roughly 45 times the size of Ancona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ancona for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison