Skip to main content

Andergrove vs Bungalow

Property investment comparison - Andergrove, QLD 4740 vs Bungalow, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Andergrove wins 1, Bungalow wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAndergroveBungalow
Median house price$690K$690K
Median unit price$465K$375K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.28%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.75%6.38%
1-year house growth+15.0%+16.6%
3-year house growth+59.5%+43.9%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.7%
Population9,9242,358

Andergrove vs Bungalow: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $690K in Andergrove and $690K in Bungalow.

For units, Andergrove sits at a median of $465K against $375K in Bungalow, which makes Bungalow the more affordable unit market and Andergrove the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.0% in Andergrove and +16.6% in Bungalow, so recent momentum favours Bungalow, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Andergrove houses are +59.5% and Bungalow houses +43.9%, so Andergrove has compounded faster than Bungalow over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Bungalow and 1.9% in Andergrove, so landlords in Bungalow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Andergrove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,924 against 2,358, roughly 4.2 times the size of Bungalow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bungalow for recent price momentum, Bungalow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison