Anderson vs Carrum
Property investment comparison - Anderson, VIC 3995 vs Carrum, VIC 3197
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anderson wins 1, Carrum wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anderson | Carrum |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $830K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.32% | 3.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +4.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 6.2% | 1.2% |
| Population | 26 | 4,239 |
Anderson vs Carrum: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Anderson and $1.1M in Carrum, so Anderson is the cheaper entry point, with Carrum houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Carrum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 2.32% in Anderson, a gap of 1.01 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrum and 6.2% in Anderson, so landlords in Carrum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Carrum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,239 against 26, roughly 163 times the size of Anderson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Carrum for rental income, Anderson for a lower purchase price, Carrum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison