Anderson vs Seddon
Property investment comparison - Anderson, VIC 3995 vs Seddon, VIC 3011
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anderson wins 1, Seddon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anderson | Seddon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $715K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.32% | 3.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 6.2% | 1.6% |
| Population | 26 | 5,143 |
Anderson vs Seddon: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Anderson and $1.1M in Seddon, so Anderson is the cheaper entry point, with Seddon houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Seddon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.45%, compared with 2.32% in Anderson, a gap of 1.13 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Seddon and 6.2% in Anderson, so landlords in Seddon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seddon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,143 against 26, roughly 198 times the size of Anderson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seddon for rental income, Anderson for a lower purchase price, Seddon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison