Skip to main content

Anketell vs Collingwood Heights

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Collingwood Heights, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Collingwood Heights wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellCollingwood Heights
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$495K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%2.55%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%6.28%
1-year house growth+20.2%-
3-year house growth-11.7%-
Vacancy rate2.9%1.4%
Population280694

Anketell vs Collingwood Heights: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $495K in Collingwood Heights, which makes Collingwood Heights the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 2.55% in Collingwood Heights, a gap of 1.85 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Collingwood Heights and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Collingwood Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Collingwood Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 694 against 280, roughly 2.5 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Collingwood Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison