Skip to main content

Anketell vs Dudley Park

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Dudley Park, WA 6210

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Dudley Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellDudley Park
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$590K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.27%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%4.45%
1-year house growth+20.2%+20.4%estimate
3-year house growth-11.7%-
Vacancy rate2.9%1.7%
Population2806,957

Anketell vs Dudley Park: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $590K in Dudley Park, which makes Dudley Park the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.27% in Dudley Park, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +20.4% in Dudley Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Dudley Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Dudley Park and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Dudley Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dudley Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,957 against 280, roughly 25 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Dudley Park for recent price momentum, Dudley Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison