Skip to main content

Anketell vs Greenfields

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Greenfields, WA 6210

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Greenfields wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellGreenfields
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%5.20%
1-year house growth+20.2%+17.3%estimate
3-year house growth-11.7%-
Vacancy rate2.9%1.8%
Population2809,869

Anketell vs Greenfields: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Greenfields leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.40% in Anketell, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +17.3% in Greenfields (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Greenfields and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Greenfields face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Greenfields is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,869 against 280, roughly 35 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Greenfields for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, Greenfields for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison