Skip to main content

Anketell vs Koondoola

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Koondoola, WA 6064

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 0, Koondoola wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellKoondoola
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.58%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%5.39%
1-year house growth+20.2%+22.8%
3-year house growth-11.7%+84.8%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.9%
Population2803,919

Anketell vs Koondoola: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Koondoola leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.58%, compared with 4.40% in Anketell, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +22.8% in Koondoola, so recent momentum favours Koondoola, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Koondoola houses +84.8%, so Koondoola has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Koondoola and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Koondoola face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Koondoola is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,919 against 280, roughly 14 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Koondoola for rental income, Koondoola for recent price momentum, Koondoola for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison