Skip to main content

Anketell vs Lange

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Lange, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 3, Lange wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellLange
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%3.96%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%3.58%
1-year house growth+20.2%+18.4%
3-year house growth-11.7%+69.6%
Vacancy rate2.9%2.6%
Population280394

Anketell vs Lange: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $750K in Lange, which makes Anketell the more affordable unit market and Lange the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.96% in Lange, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +18.4% in Lange, so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Lange houses +69.6%, so Lange has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Lange and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Lange face less competition for tenants.

Lange is the bigger suburb, with a population of 394 against 280, larger than Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, Lange for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison