Skip to main content

Anketell vs Mira Mar

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Mira Mar, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Mira Mar wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellMira Mar
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%3.74%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%4.93%
1-year house growth+20.2%-
3-year house growth-11.7%+72.0%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.5%
Population2801,890

Anketell vs Mira Mar: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $485K in Mira Mar, which makes Mira Mar the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.74% in Mira Mar, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Mira Mar houses +72.0%, so Mira Mar has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Mira Mar and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Mira Mar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mira Mar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,890 against 280, roughly 7 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Mira Mar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison