Anketell vs Oldbury
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Oldbury, WA 6121
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 4, Oldbury wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Oldbury |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | $695K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 2.25% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | +19.3% |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | +62.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Population | 280 | 296 |
Anketell vs Oldbury: what the numbers say
For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $695K in Oldbury, which makes Anketell the more affordable unit market and Oldbury the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +19.3% in Oldbury, so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Oldbury houses +62.3%, so Oldbury has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Anketell and 3.4% in Oldbury, so landlords in Anketell face less competition for tenants.
Oldbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 296 against 280, larger than Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for recent price momentum, Anketell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison