Skip to main content

Anketell vs Parkwood

Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Parkwood, WA 6147

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 3, Parkwood wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnketellParkwood
Median house price$810K-
Median unit price$670K$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.12%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%5.00%
1-year house growth+20.2%+19.7%
3-year house growth-11.7%+66.2%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.9%
Population2805,995

Anketell vs Parkwood: what the numbers say

For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $710K in Parkwood, which makes Anketell the more affordable unit market and Parkwood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.12% in Parkwood, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +19.7% in Parkwood, so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Anketell houses are -11.7% and Parkwood houses +66.2%, so Parkwood has compounded faster than Anketell over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Parkwood and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Parkwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,995 against 280, roughly 21 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anketell for rental income, Anketell for recent price momentum, Parkwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison