Anketell vs Port Albany
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Port Albany, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Port Albany wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Port Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | 1.76% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 5.70% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 0.3% |
| Population | 280 | 133 |
Anketell vs Port Albany: what the numbers say
For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $570K in Port Albany, which makes Port Albany the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.
On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 1.76% in Port Albany, a gap of 2.64 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Port Albany and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Port Albany face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Anketell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 280 against 133, roughly 2.1 times the size of Port Albany; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for rental income, Port Albany for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison