Anketell vs Robinson
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Robinson, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 2, Robinson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Robinson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | $370K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | 3.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 7.35% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Population | 280 | 696 |
Anketell vs Robinson: what the numbers say
For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $370K in Robinson, which makes Robinson the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.
On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.35% in Robinson, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.9%.
Robinson is the bigger suburb, with a population of 696 against 280, roughly 2.5 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison