Anketell vs San Remo
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs San Remo, WA 6210
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 0, San Remo wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | San Remo |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 4.10% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | +23.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 1.3% |
| Population | 280 | 1,022 |
Anketell vs San Remo: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +23.8% in San Remo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours San Remo, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in San Remo and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in San Remo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
San Remo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,022 against 280, roughly 3.6 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: San Remo for recent price momentum, San Remo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison