Anketell vs Shadforth
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Shadforth, WA 6333
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 1, Shadforth wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Shadforth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | $285K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | 2.39% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 7.46% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Population | 280 | 715 |
Anketell vs Shadforth: what the numbers say
For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $285K in Shadforth, which makes Shadforth the more affordable unit market and Anketell the pricier one.
On cash flow, Anketell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 2.39% in Shadforth, a gap of 2.01 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Shadforth and 2.9% in Anketell, so landlords in Shadforth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Shadforth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 715 against 280, roughly 2.6 times the size of Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for rental income, Shadforth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison