Anketell vs Upper Swan
Property investment comparison - Anketell, WA 6167 vs Upper Swan, WA 6069
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anketell wins 4, Upper Swan wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Anketell | Upper Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | - |
| Median unit price | $670K | $840K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 2.17% |
| 1-year house growth | +20.2% | +20.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -11.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 7.2% |
| Population | 280 | 549 |
Anketell vs Upper Swan: what the numbers say
For units, Anketell sits at a median of $670K against $840K in Upper Swan, which makes Anketell the more affordable unit market and Upper Swan the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Anketell and +20.0% in Upper Swan (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Anketell, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Anketell and 7.2% in Upper Swan, so landlords in Anketell face less competition for tenants.
Upper Swan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 549 against 280, larger than Anketell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Anketell for recent price momentum, Anketell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison