Skip to main content

Anna Bay vs Millfield

Property investment comparison - Anna Bay, NSW 2316 vs Millfield, NSW 2325

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Anna Bay wins 2, Millfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnna BayMillfield
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$680K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%2.43%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%4.84%
1-year house growth+6.3%estimate+10.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.7%1.3%
Population4,2211,282

Anna Bay vs Millfield: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Anna Bay and $1.1M in Millfield.

For units, Anna Bay sits at a median of $680K against $465K in Millfield, which makes Millfield the more affordable unit market and Anna Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Anna Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.43% in Millfield, a gap of 1.17 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Anna Bay (an estimate) and +10.2% in Millfield (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Millfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Anna Bay and 1.3% in Millfield, so landlords in Anna Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Anna Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,221 against 1,282, roughly 3.3 times the size of Millfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Anna Bay for rental income, Millfield for recent price momentum, Anna Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison