Annangrove vs Putney
Property investment comparison - Annangrove, NSW 2156 vs Putney, NSW 2112
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Annangrove wins 2, Putney wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Annangrove | Putney |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.5M | $3.5M |
| Median unit price | $1.4M | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.58% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.92% | 2.74% |
| 1-year house growth | -7.2% | -6.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -2.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 3.0% |
| Population | 1,472 | 4,097 |
Annangrove vs Putney: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.5M in Annangrove and $3.5M in Putney, so Putney is the cheaper entry point, with Annangrove houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved -7.2% in Annangrove and -6.1% in Putney (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Putney, while Annangrove went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Annangrove and 3.0% in Putney, so landlords in Annangrove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Putney is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,097 against 1,472, roughly 2.8 times the size of Annangrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Putney for a lower purchase price, Putney for recent price momentum, Annangrove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison