Skip to main content

Annerley vs Mansfield

Property investment comparison - Annerley, QLD 4103 vs Mansfield, QLD 4122

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Annerley wins 1, Mansfield wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnnerleyMansfield
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price-$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%4.15%
1-year house growth+9.8%+14.3%
3-year house growth+32.1%+53.4%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.8%
Population11,8918,851

Annerley vs Mansfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Annerley and $1.5M in Mansfield, so Annerley is the cheaper entry point, with Mansfield houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Annerley and +14.3% in Mansfield, so recent momentum favours Mansfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Annerley houses are +32.1% and Mansfield houses +53.4%, so Mansfield has compounded faster than Annerley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Mansfield and 0.9% in Annerley, so landlords in Mansfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Annerley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,891 against 8,851, larger than Mansfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Annerley for a lower purchase price, Mansfield for recent price momentum, Mansfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison