Skip to main content

Annerley vs Mount Lindesay

Property investment comparison - Annerley, QLD 4103 vs Mount Lindesay, QLD 4287

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Annerley wins 3, Mount Lindesay wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAnnerleyMount Lindesay
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.80%1.96%
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%-
1-year house growth+9.8%-
3-year house growth+32.1%-
Vacancy rate0.9%2.6%
Population11,89114

Annerley vs Mount Lindesay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Annerley and $1.5M in Mount Lindesay, so Annerley is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Lindesay houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Annerley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.80%, compared with 1.96% in Mount Lindesay, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Annerley and 2.6% in Mount Lindesay, so landlords in Annerley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Annerley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,891 against 14, roughly 849 times the size of Mount Lindesay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Annerley for rental income, Annerley for a lower purchase price, Annerley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison