Antwerp vs Mooroopna
Property investment comparison - Antwerp, VIC 3414 vs Mooroopna, VIC 3629
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Antwerp wins 2, Mooroopna wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Antwerp | Mooroopna |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $480K | $485K |
| Median unit price | - | $315K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.71% | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.65% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +23.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 1.2% |
| Population | 53 | 8,312 |
Antwerp vs Mooroopna: what the numbers say
The median house price is $480K in Antwerp and $485K in Mooroopna, so Antwerp is the cheaper entry point, with Mooroopna houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Mooroopna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.71% in Antwerp, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Antwerp and 1.2% in Mooroopna, so landlords in Antwerp face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mooroopna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,312 against 53, roughly 157 times the size of Antwerp; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mooroopna for rental income, Antwerp for a lower purchase price, Antwerp for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison