Antwerp vs Venus Bay
Property investment comparison - Antwerp, VIC 3414 vs Venus Bay, VIC 3956
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Antwerp wins 3, Venus Bay wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Antwerp | Venus Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $480K | $490K |
| Median unit price | - | $495K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.71% | 4.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.49% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +0.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -30.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Population | 53 | 904 |
Antwerp vs Venus Bay: what the numbers say
The median house price is $480K in Antwerp and $490K in Venus Bay, so Antwerp is the cheaper entry point, with Venus Bay houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Antwerp leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.71%, compared with 4.33% in Venus Bay, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Antwerp and 1.1% in Venus Bay, so landlords in Antwerp face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Venus Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 904 against 53, roughly 17 times the size of Antwerp; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Antwerp for rental income, Antwerp for a lower purchase price, Antwerp for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison