Skip to main content

Apollo Bay vs Tarago

Property investment comparison - Apollo Bay, VIC 3233 vs Tarago, VIC 3818

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Apollo Bay wins 2, Tarago wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricApollo BayTarago
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price$710K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%3.26%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.21%
1-year house growth-6.3%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.6%
Population1,79021,626

Apollo Bay vs Tarago: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Apollo Bay and $800K in Tarago.

For units, Apollo Bay sits at a median of $710K against $450K in Tarago, which makes Tarago the more affordable unit market and Apollo Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Apollo Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 3.26% in Tarago, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Apollo Bay and 1.6% in Tarago, so landlords in Apollo Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tarago is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,626 against 1,790, roughly 12 times the size of Apollo Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Apollo Bay for rental income, Apollo Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison