Skip to main content

Apollo Bay vs Yelta

Property investment comparison - Apollo Bay, VIC 3233 vs Yelta, VIC 3505

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Apollo Bay wins 3, Yelta wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricApollo BayYelta
Median house price$800K$805K
Median unit price$710K$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%2.25%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.19%
1-year house growth-6.3%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.4%
Population1,790325

Apollo Bay vs Yelta: what the numbers say

The median house price is $800K in Apollo Bay and $805K in Yelta, so Apollo Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Yelta houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Apollo Bay sits at a median of $710K against $350K in Yelta, which makes Yelta the more affordable unit market and Apollo Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Apollo Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 2.25% in Yelta, a gap of 1.08 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Apollo Bay and 1.4% in Yelta, so landlords in Apollo Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Apollo Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,790 against 325, roughly 6 times the size of Yelta; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Apollo Bay for rental income, Apollo Bay for a lower purchase price, Apollo Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison