Skip to main content

Apple Tree Creek vs Oakey

Property investment comparison - Apple Tree Creek, QLD 4660 vs Oakey, QLD 4401

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Apple Tree Creek wins 1, Oakey wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricApple Tree CreekOakey
Median house price$660K$655K
Median unit price$215K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.12%3.88%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%-
1-year house growth+17.9%-
3-year house growth+57.5%+89.3%
Vacancy rate4.2%0.8%
Population7264,756

Apple Tree Creek vs Oakey: what the numbers say

The median house price is $660K in Apple Tree Creek and $655K in Oakey, so Oakey is the cheaper entry point, with Apple Tree Creek houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Apple Tree Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.12%, compared with 3.88% in Oakey, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Apple Tree Creek houses are +57.5% and Oakey houses +89.3%, so Oakey has compounded faster than Apple Tree Creek over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Oakey and 4.2% in Apple Tree Creek, so landlords in Oakey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oakey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,756 against 726, roughly 7 times the size of Apple Tree Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Apple Tree Creek for rental income, Oakey for a lower purchase price, Oakey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison