Apsley vs Charlton
Property investment comparison - Apsley, VIC 3319 vs Charlton, VIC 3525
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Apsley wins 0, Charlton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Apsley | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $335K | $330K |
| Median unit price | - | $330K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.01% | 6.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.49% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +0.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.7% |
| Population | 329 | 1,095 |
Apsley vs Charlton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $335K in Apsley and $330K in Charlton, so Charlton is the cheaper entry point, with Apsley houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Charlton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.95%, compared with 4.01% in Apsley, a gap of 2.94 percentage points.
Charlton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,095 against 329, roughly 3.3 times the size of Apsley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charlton for rental income, Charlton for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison