Apsley vs Kerang
Property investment comparison - Apsley, VIC 3319 vs Kerang, VIC 3579
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Apsley wins 0, Kerang wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Apsley | Kerang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $335K | $330K |
| Median unit price | - | $220K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.01% | 5.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.7% |
| Population | 329 | 3,960 |
Apsley vs Kerang: what the numbers say
The median house price is $335K in Apsley and $330K in Kerang, so Kerang is the cheaper entry point, with Apsley houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Kerang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.84%, compared with 4.01% in Apsley, a gap of 1.83 percentage points.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 329, roughly 12 times the size of Apsley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kerang for rental income, Kerang for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison