Skip to main content

Ararat vs Benalla

Property investment comparison - Ararat, VIC 3377 vs Benalla, VIC 3673

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ararat wins 2, Benalla wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAraratBenalla
Median house price$440K$445K
Median unit price$335K$315K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.20%5.87%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.31%
1-year house growth+13.4%-
3-year house growth+12.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%3.0%
Population8,50010,822

Ararat vs Benalla: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Ararat and $445K in Benalla, so Ararat is the cheaper entry point, with Benalla houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ararat sits at a median of $335K against $315K in Benalla, which makes Benalla the more affordable unit market and Ararat the pricier one.

On cash flow, Benalla leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.87%, compared with 5.20% in Ararat, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Ararat and 3.0% in Benalla, so landlords in Ararat face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Benalla is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,822 against 8,500, larger than Ararat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Benalla for rental income, Ararat for a lower purchase price, Ararat for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison