Ararat vs East Sale
Property investment comparison - Ararat, VIC 3377 vs East Sale, VIC 3852
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ararat wins 1, East Sale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ararat | East Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $440K | $425K |
| Median unit price | $335K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.20% | 4.52% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +12.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | - |
| Population | 8,500 | 210 |
Ararat vs East Sale: what the numbers say
The median house price is $440K in Ararat and $425K in East Sale, so East Sale is the cheaper entry point, with Ararat houses about 4% dearer.
On cash flow, Ararat leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.52% in East Sale, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.
Ararat is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,500 against 210, roughly 40 times the size of East Sale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ararat for rental income, East Sale for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison