Skip to main content

Ararat vs Newmerella

Property investment comparison - Ararat, VIC 3377 vs Newmerella, VIC 3886

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ararat wins 5, Newmerella wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAraratNewmerella
Median house price$440K$445K
Median unit price$335K$390K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.20%4.14%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.59%
1-year house growth+13.4%+3.1%
3-year house growth+12.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%5.0%
Population8,500415

Ararat vs Newmerella: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Ararat and $445K in Newmerella, so Ararat is the cheaper entry point, with Newmerella houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ararat sits at a median of $335K against $390K in Newmerella, which makes Ararat the more affordable unit market and Newmerella the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ararat leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.14% in Newmerella, a gap of 1.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Ararat and +3.1% in Newmerella, so recent momentum favours Ararat, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Ararat and 5.0% in Newmerella, so landlords in Ararat face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ararat is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,500 against 415, roughly 20 times the size of Newmerella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ararat for rental income, Ararat for a lower purchase price, Ararat for recent price momentum, Ararat for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison