Skip to main content

Arcadia Vale vs Summerland Point

Property investment comparison - Arcadia Vale, NSW 2283 vs Summerland Point, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Arcadia Vale wins 1, Summerland Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArcadia ValeSummerland Point
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$595K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.21%-
1-year house growth+13.2%+13.5%estimate
3-year house growth+17.0%-
Vacancy rate1.7%2.9%
Population1,4312,708

Arcadia Vale vs Summerland Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Arcadia Vale and $900K in Summerland Point.

For units, Arcadia Vale sits at a median of $595K against $580K in Summerland Point, which makes Summerland Point the more affordable unit market and Arcadia Vale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.2% in Arcadia Vale and +13.5% in Summerland Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Summerland Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Arcadia Vale and 2.9% in Summerland Point, so landlords in Arcadia Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Summerland Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,708 against 1,431, larger than Arcadia Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Summerland Point for recent price momentum, Arcadia Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison