Skip to main content

Armidale vs Chatham

Property investment comparison - Armidale, NSW 2350 vs Chatham, NSW 2430

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Armidale wins 1, Chatham wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArmidaleChatham
Median house price$650K$645K
Median unit price$405K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.24%4.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.95%5.43%
1-year house growth+19.1%-10.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.3%1.3%
Population23,96736,841

Armidale vs Chatham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $650K in Armidale and $645K in Chatham, so Chatham is the cheaper entry point, with Armidale houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Armidale sits at a median of $405K against $400K in Chatham, which makes Chatham the more affordable unit market and Armidale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Chatham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.52%, compared with 4.24% in Armidale, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.1% in Armidale and -10.7% in Chatham (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Armidale, while Chatham went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Chatham and 2.3% in Armidale, so landlords in Chatham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chatham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 36,841 against 23,967, larger than Armidale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Chatham for rental income, Chatham for a lower purchase price, Armidale for recent price momentum, Chatham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison