Skip to main content

Armstrong vs Derrimut

Property investment comparison - Armstrong, VIC 3377 vs Derrimut, VIC 3026

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Armstrong wins 2, Derrimut wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArmstrongDerrimut
Median house price$845K$840K
Median unit price$325K$830K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.92%3.73%
Gross rental yield (units)6.72%2.42%
1-year house growth-+10.2%
3-year house growth-+13.2%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.8%
Population908,651

Armstrong vs Derrimut: what the numbers say

The median house price is $845K in Armstrong and $840K in Derrimut, so Derrimut is the cheaper entry point, with Armstrong houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Armstrong sits at a median of $325K against $830K in Derrimut, which makes Armstrong the more affordable unit market and Derrimut the pricier one.

On cash flow, Derrimut leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 2.92% in Armstrong, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Derrimut and 1.8% in Armstrong, so landlords in Derrimut face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Derrimut is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,651 against 90, roughly 96 times the size of Armstrong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Derrimut for rental income, Derrimut for a lower purchase price, Derrimut for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison