Skip to main content

Arncliffe vs North Parramatta

Property investment comparison - Arncliffe, NSW 2205 vs North Parramatta, NSW 2151

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Arncliffe wins 0, North Parramatta wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArncliffeNorth Parramatta
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$795K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.19%
Gross rental yield (units)5.43%-
1-year house growth+4.3%+5.2%estimate
3-year house growth+10.3%-
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population12,02312,064

Arncliffe vs North Parramatta: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Arncliffe and $1.9M in North Parramatta, so North Parramatta is the cheaper entry point, with Arncliffe houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Arncliffe sits at a median of $795K against $700K in North Parramatta, which makes North Parramatta the more affordable unit market and Arncliffe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Arncliffe and +5.2% in North Parramatta (an estimate), so recent momentum favours North Parramatta, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in North Parramatta and 2.0% in Arncliffe, so landlords in North Parramatta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Parramatta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,064 against 12,023, larger than Arncliffe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Parramatta for a lower purchase price, North Parramatta for recent price momentum, North Parramatta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison