Skip to main content

Aroona vs Logan Village

Property investment comparison - Aroona, QLD 4551 vs Logan Village, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aroona wins 2, Logan Village wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAroonaLogan Village
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$930K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.61%3.07%
Gross rental yield (units)3.99%4.84%
1-year house growth+16.7%estimate+13.1%
3-year house growth-+47.7%
Vacancy rate5.3%2.1%
Population3,4665,316

Aroona vs Logan Village: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Aroona and $1.3M in Logan Village, so Logan Village is the cheaper entry point, with Aroona houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Aroona sits at a median of $930K against $580K in Logan Village, which makes Logan Village the more affordable unit market and Aroona the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aroona leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.61%, compared with 3.07% in Logan Village, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.7% in Aroona (an estimate) and +13.1% in Logan Village, so recent momentum favours Aroona, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Logan Village and 5.3% in Aroona, so landlords in Logan Village face less competition for tenants.

Logan Village is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,316 against 3,466, larger than Aroona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aroona for rental income, Logan Village for a lower purchase price, Aroona for recent price momentum, Logan Village for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison