Skip to main content

Aroona vs Maroochydore

Property investment comparison - Aroona, QLD 4551 vs Maroochydore, QLD 4558

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aroona wins 1, Maroochydore wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAroonaMaroochydore
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$930K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.61%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.99%-
1-year house growth+16.7%estimate+13.7%
3-year house growth-+28.4%
Vacancy rate5.3%1.3%
Population3,46620,629

Aroona vs Maroochydore: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Aroona and $1.3M in Maroochydore.

For units, Aroona sits at a median of $930K against $910K in Maroochydore, which makes Maroochydore the more affordable unit market and Aroona the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.7% in Aroona (an estimate) and +13.7% in Maroochydore, so recent momentum favours Aroona, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Maroochydore and 5.3% in Aroona, so landlords in Maroochydore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maroochydore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,629 against 3,466, roughly 6 times the size of Aroona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aroona for recent price momentum, Maroochydore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison