Skip to main content

Artarmon vs Bringelly

Property investment comparison - Artarmon, NSW 2064 vs Bringelly, NSW 2556

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Artarmon wins 4, Bringelly wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArtarmonBringelly
Median house price$3.6M$3.6M
Median unit price$1.1M$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.20%1.21%
Gross rental yield (units)3.81%1.96%
1-year house growth+0.2%estimate-2.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%0.9%
Population9,4172,433

Artarmon vs Bringelly: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.6M in Artarmon and $3.6M in Bringelly, so Bringelly is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Artarmon sits at a median of $1.1M against $1.2M in Bringelly, which makes Artarmon the more affordable unit market and Bringelly the pricier one.

On cash flow, Artarmon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.20%, compared with 1.21% in Bringelly, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.2% in Artarmon (an estimate) and -2.4% in Bringelly (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Artarmon, while Bringelly went backwards.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.0%.

Artarmon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,417 against 2,433, roughly 3.9 times the size of Bringelly; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Artarmon for rental income, Bringelly for a lower purchase price, Artarmon for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison