Skip to main content

Artarmon vs Knockrow

Property investment comparison - Artarmon, NSW 2064 vs Knockrow, NSW 2479

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Artarmon wins 4, Knockrow wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricArtarmonKnockrow
Median house price$3.6M$3.6M
Median unit price$1.1M$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.20%1.95%
Gross rental yield (units)3.81%3.21%
1-year house growth+0.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%2.5%
Population9,417186

Artarmon vs Knockrow: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.6M in Artarmon and $3.6M in Knockrow, so Artarmon is the cheaper entry point, with Knockrow houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Artarmon sits at a median of $1.1M against $1.1M in Knockrow, which makes Knockrow the more affordable unit market and Artarmon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Artarmon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.20%, compared with 1.95% in Knockrow, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Artarmon and 2.5% in Knockrow, so landlords in Artarmon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Artarmon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,417 against 186, roughly 51 times the size of Knockrow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Artarmon for rental income, Artarmon for a lower purchase price, Artarmon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison