Skip to main content

Ascot Vale vs Blackburn South

Property investment comparison - Ascot Vale, VIC 3032 vs Blackburn South, VIC 3130

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ascot Vale wins 3, Blackburn South wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAscot ValeBlackburn South
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$670K$955K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%3.48%
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate-2.7%
3-year house growth-+1.0%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.6%
Population15,19710,939

Ascot Vale vs Blackburn South: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Ascot Vale and $1.4M in Blackburn South.

For units, Ascot Vale sits at a median of $670K against $955K in Blackburn South, which makes Ascot Vale the more affordable unit market and Blackburn South the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.2% in Ascot Vale (an estimate) and -2.7% in Blackburn South, so recent momentum favours Ascot Vale, while Blackburn South went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Blackburn South and 1.8% in Ascot Vale, so landlords in Blackburn South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ascot Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,197 against 10,939, larger than Blackburn South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ascot Vale for recent price momentum, Blackburn South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison