Skip to main content

Ascot Vale vs Brunswick West

Property investment comparison - Ascot Vale, VIC 3032 vs Brunswick West, VIC 3055

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ascot Vale wins 1, Brunswick West wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAscot ValeBrunswick West
Median house price$1.4M$1.3M
Median unit price$670K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%-
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate+1.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%1.7%
Population15,19714,746

Ascot Vale vs Brunswick West: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ascot Vale and $1.3M in Brunswick West, so Brunswick West is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.2% in Ascot Vale (an estimate) and +1.9% in Brunswick West (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ascot Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Brunswick West and 1.8% in Ascot Vale, so landlords in Brunswick West face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ascot Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,197 against 14,746, larger than Brunswick West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick West for a lower purchase price, Ascot Vale for recent price momentum, Brunswick West for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison