Skip to main content

Ascot Vale vs Moorilim

Property investment comparison - Ascot Vale, VIC 3032 vs Moorilim, VIC 3610

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ascot Vale wins 3, Moorilim wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAscot ValeMoorilim
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$670K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%1.78%
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%4.60%
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%3.9%
Population15,19725

Ascot Vale vs Moorilim: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ascot Vale and $1.4M in Moorilim, so Ascot Vale is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Ascot Vale sits at a median of $670K against $455K in Moorilim, which makes Moorilim the more affordable unit market and Ascot Vale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ascot Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.97%, compared with 1.78% in Moorilim, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Ascot Vale and 3.9% in Moorilim, so landlords in Ascot Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ascot Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,197 against 25, roughly 608 times the size of Moorilim; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ascot Vale for rental income, Ascot Vale for a lower purchase price, Ascot Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison