Ashby vs Ballajura
Property investment comparison - Ashby, WA 6065 vs Ballajura, WA 6066
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashby wins 1, Ballajura wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ashby | Ballajura |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | $920K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 4.38% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.95% | 4.90% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +17.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| Population | 2,850 | 18,459 |
Ashby vs Ballajura: what the numbers say
The median house price is $930K in Ashby and $920K in Ballajura, so Ballajura is the cheaper entry point, with Ashby houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Ballajura leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.38%, compared with 4.10% in Ashby, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Ballajura and 0.9% in Ashby, so landlords in Ballajura face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ballajura is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,459 against 2,850, roughly 6 times the size of Ashby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ballajura for rental income, Ballajura for a lower purchase price, Ballajura for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison