Ashby vs Red Hill
Property investment comparison - Ashby, WA 6065 vs Red Hill, WA 6056
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashby wins 2, Red Hill wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ashby | Red Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | $935K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.95% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| Population | 2,850 | 85 |
Ashby vs Red Hill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $930K in Ashby and $935K in Red Hill, so Ashby is the cheaper entry point, with Red Hill houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Ashby and 1.0% in Red Hill, so landlords in Ashby face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ashby is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,850 against 85, roughly 34 times the size of Red Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ashby for a lower purchase price, Ashby for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison