Skip to main content

Ashfield vs Strathfield South

Property investment comparison - Ashfield, NSW 2131 vs Strathfield South, NSW 2136

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashfield wins 1, Strathfield South wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAshfieldStrathfield South
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$900K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.27%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.94%-
1-year house growth-1.0%+0.6%estimate
3-year house growth+14.5%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.1%
Population23,0123,636

Ashfield vs Strathfield South: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Ashfield and $2.3M in Strathfield South, so Strathfield South is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Ashfield sits at a median of $900K against $725K in Strathfield South, which makes Strathfield South the more affordable unit market and Ashfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.0% in Ashfield and +0.6% in Strathfield South (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Strathfield South, while Ashfield went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Ashfield and 2.1% in Strathfield South, so landlords in Ashfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ashfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,012 against 3,636, roughly 6 times the size of Strathfield South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Strathfield South for a lower purchase price, Strathfield South for recent price momentum, Ashfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison